Reviewed: July 2016
Approved by Directors: July 2016
Review Date: July 2017
This procedure is intended as a guide to apply to most general complaints which the schools are likely to receive from parents. It also meets the Circular 6/94 requirement to have a school policy about complaints concerning SEND provision within the school.
It is not intended to cover those aspects of school life for which there are specific statutory requirements: in particular, arrangements under s409 of the Education Act 1996 for complaints about the delivery of the National
Curriculum and the provision of collective worship and religious education. Parents who are not satisfied with an LEA’s decision about special needs assessments may appeal to the SEN Tribunal. Concerns about schools admissions and exclusions also have specific appeal rights.
In addition allegations of child abuse, financial improprieties or other criminal activities will need to be dealt with through different procedures, as will complaints about contracted staff.
Some complaints about general matters of policy, such as the overall resourcing of a school, would also need to be dealt with differently.
This procedure has been outlined in a leaflet which is clearly displayed on the school website and in the school’s Prospectus. (see Appendix A). The existence of this policy will be publicised on our school website and in the school’s Prospectus.
The First Contact
Dealing with Concerns and Complaints Informally
The vast majority of concerns and complaints will be resolved informally. There are many occasions where concerns are resolved straight away through the class teacher or school business manager (Elaine Ingleby) or Head of School (Maggie Latimer), or Deputy Head Teacher (Meryl Senior.) This may depend on whom the parents first approach.
Parents should feel able to raise a concern with members of staff without any formality, either in person, by telephone or in writing. On occasion it may be appropriate for someone to act on behalf of a parent.
At first it may be unclear whether a parent is asking a question or expressing an opinion rather than making a complaint. A parent may want a preliminary discussion about an issue to help decide whether he or she wishes to take it further.
Procedure to use at Stage 1
- Parents have an opportunity for discussion of their concern with the appropriate member of staff who will clarify with the parent the nature of the concern, and reassure them that the school wants to hear about it. The member of staff may explain to the parent how the situation happened. It can be helpful to identify at this point what sort of outcome the parent is looking for.
- If the member of staff first contacted cannot immediately deal with the matter, s/he will make a clear note of the date, name, and contact address or phone number.
- Any member of staff will know how to refer, if necessary, to the person with responsibility for the particular issue raised by the parent. S/he will check later to make sure the referral has been successful.
- If the concern relates to the Head Teacher, the parent is advised to contact the Chair of the Governing Body.
- The staff member dealing with the concern makes sure that the parent is clear what action (if any) or monitoring of the situation has been agreed, putting this in writing only if this seems the best way of making things clear.
- Where no satisfactory solution has been found within10 days, parents will be asked if they wish their concern to be considered further. If so they will be given clear information, both orally and in writing, about how to proceed and about any independent person available to them. See Appendix A
Referral to the Head of School for Investigation
At this stage it will have become clear that the concern is a definite complaint. In some cases the Head of School has already been involved in looking at the matter; in others it is his/her first involvement. In either case, it is helpful for the Head of School (or the person delegated to investigate) will use guidelines to ensure consistency among cases, and to make sure that nothing happens at this stage which could make it difficult for later stages to proceed smoothly.
As Head Teachers have responsibility for the day-to-day running of their schools, they have responsibility for the implementation of a complaints system, including the decisions about their own involvement at various stages.
One of the reasons for having various “stages” in a complaints procedure is to reassure complainants that their grievance is being heard by more than one person.
The Head of School will make arrangements to ensure that their involvement will not predominate at every stage of a particular complaint. For example arrangements may be made for other staff to deal with parents’ concerns at Stage 1, while the Head of School will deal with contacts with parents at Stage 2. Even at that stage the Head of School may designate another member of staff to collect some of the information from various parties involved. In some cases, the Head of School may be so involved at Stage 1 that Stage 2 has to be carried out by the Executive Head Teacher.
Procedure to use at Stage 2
- The Head of School (or designate) will acknowledge the complaint orally or in writing within 3 working days of receiving the written complaint. The acknowledgement gives a brief explanation of the school’s complaint procedure and a target date for providing a response to the complaint. This should normally be within 10 working days; if this proves impossible, a letter is sent explaining the reason for the delay and giving a revised target date.
- The Head of School (or designate) will provide an opportunity for the complainant to meet him/her to supplement information provided previously. It will be made clear to the complainant that if s/he wishes,
s/he may be accompanied to any meeting by a friend, relative, representative, or advocate who can speak on his or her behalf; and that interpreting facilities are available if needed.
- If necessary, the Head of School (or designate) will interview witnesses and take statements from those involved. If the complaint centers around a pupil, the pupil should also be interviewed. In certain circumstances the parent may be invited to attend the interview with the child or another member of staff with whom the pupil feels comfortable may be asked to attend. If a member of staff is complained against, the needs of that person will be borne in mind.
- The Head of School (or designate) will keep written records of meetings, telephone conversations, and other documentation.
- Once all the relevant facts have been established, the Head of School (or designate) should then produce a written response to the complainant to discuss/resolve the matter directly.
- A written response includes a full explanation of the decision and the reasons for it. Where appropriate, this includes what action the school will take to resolve the complaint. The complainant is advised that should s/he wish to take the complaint further s/he should notify the Chair of the Governing Body (Mr A Richards) within five weeks of receiving the outcome letter.
- If a complaint is against the action of the Head of School, or if the Head of School has been very closely involved in Stage 1, the Chair of Governing Body should carry out all the Stage 2 procedures.
Review by the Governing Body
Complaints only rarely reach this formal level. This review will be independent and impartial, therefore, individual complaints should not be considered by the full governing body as serious conflicts of interest can arise; for example, in exceptional circumstances a complaint may result in disciplinary action against a member of staff, and governors may be required to give an unprejudiced hearing to an appeal by the member of staff concerned. Similarly some governors might have previous knowledge of the problem which led to the complaint and would be unable to give unfair biased consideration to the issue.
Many complaints are inevitably seen by parents as being “against” a particular member of staff and their actions. However, all complaints which reach this stage will have to be done so because the complainant has not been satisfied by the Head of School or Executive Head Teacher’s response at the earlier stages of the procedure, therefore it may be that the Governing Body considers the complaint is against the school rather than against the member of staff whose actions led to the original complaint.
Procedure to use at Stage 3
- Upon receipt of a written request by the complainant for the complaint to proceed to Stage 3, the procedures outlined below should be followed.
- The Clerk to Governing Body will write to the complainant to acknowledge receipt of the written request. The acknowledgement will inform the complainant that the complaint is to be heard by three members of the school’s Governing Body within 20 working days of receiving the complaint. The letter should also explain that the complainant has the right to submit any further documents relevant to the complaint. These must be received in time for the documents to be sent to the three members.
- The Clerk to the Governors should arrange to convene a Governors’ Complaints Panel elected from members of the Governing Body. It may be necessary for the Governing Body to appoint reserves to the panel to ensure that three governors are available to carry out their task within the set time.
- The Panel members should be governors who have had no prior involvement with the complaint. If s/he has not previously been involved, the Chair of the Governing Body should chair the Panel; otherwise the Vice-Chair should do it. Generally it is not appropriate for the Head of School to have a place on the Panel. Governors will want to bear in mind the advantages of having a parent (who is also a governor) on the Panel.
- The Chair/Vice- Chair will ensure that the complaint is heard by the Panel within 20 working days of receiving the letter (as outlined above). All relevant correspondence regarding the complaint should be given to each Panel member as soon as the composition of the Panel is confirmed. If the correspondence is extensive, the Chair of the Panel should prepare a thorough summary for sending to Panel members.
- The Chair/Vice –Chair will write and inform the complainant, Head of School, Executive Head Teacher, any relevant witnesses, and members of the Panel at least 5 working days in advance, of the date, time and place of the meeting. The notification to the complainant should also inform him/her of the right to be accompanied to the meeting by a friend/advocate/interpreter. The letter will also explain how the meeting will be conducted and the complainant’s right to submit further written evidence to the Panel.
- The Chair/Vice-Chair of the Governing Body should invite the Head of School and Executive Head Teacher to attend the Panel meeting and prepare a written report for the Panel in response to the complaint. The Head of School or Executive Head Teacher may also invite members of staff directly involved in matters raised by the complainant to respond in writing or in person to the complaint. Any relevant documents including the Head of school’s report should be received by all concerned – including the complainant – at least 5 working days prior to the meeting.
- The involvement of staff other than the Head of School is subject to the discretion of the Chair of the Panel.
- It is the responsibility of the Chair of the Panel to ensure that the meeting is properly minuted.
- The aim of the meeting should be to resolve the complaint and achieve between the school and the complainant. However, it has to be recognised that sometimes it may only be possible to establish facts and make recommendations which will satisfy the complainant that his or her complaint has at least been taken seriously. The Panel should remember that many parents are unused to dealing with groups of people in formal situations and may feel inhibited when speaking to the Panel. It is therefore recommended that the Chair of the Panel ensures the proceedings are as informal as possible. If either party wishes to introduce previously undisclosed evidence or witnesses, it is in the interests of natural justice to adjourn the meeting so that the other side has time to consider and respond to the new evidence.
- The meeting should allow for:
- The complainant to explain their complaint and the Executive Head Teacher or Head of School to explain the school’s response
- The Executive Head Teacher or Head of School to question the complainant and the complainant to question the Executive Head Teacher or Head of School and/or other members of staff about the school’s response
- Panel members to have an opportunity to question both the complainant and the Executive Head Teacher or Head of School
- Any party to have the right to call witnesses (subject to the approval of the Chair)
- All parties having the right to question all the witnesses final statements by both the complainant and the Head Teacher
- The Chair of the Panel will explain to the complainant and the Executive Head Teacher or Head of School that the Panel will now consider its decision, and written decision will be sent to both parties within 15 working days. The complainant, Head Teacher, other members of staff and witnesses will then leave.
- The Panel will then consider the complaint and all the evidence presented and (a) reach an unanimous, or at least a majority, decision on the complaint and (b) decide upon the appropriate action to be taken to resolve the complaint and (c) where appropriate, suggest recommended changes to the school’s systems or procedures to ensure that problems of a similar nature do not happen again.
- A written statement outlining the decision of the Panel must be sent to the complainant and Executive Head Teacher or Head of School. The letter to the complainant should explain whether a further appeal can be made, and if so, to whom.
- The school should ensure that a copy of all correspondence and notes are kept on file in the school’s records. These records should be kept separately from the pupil’s personal records.
Beyond the School
The Secretary of State for Education and Employment can receive complaints under Section 496 of the Education Act, 1996, on the grounds that a Governing Body or LEA is acting or is proposing to act unreasonably, or under Section 497 of the same Act, on the grounds that either the Governing Body or the LEA has failed to discharge its duties under the said Act. The Secretary of State may contact the Governing Body or the LEA for more information in order to consider the complaint further. These powers relate to County Schools and Voluntary Schools and Grant- Maintained School and City Technology Colleges.
Whiston Worrygoose Junior And Infant School Complaints Stages
Stage One: Expression of Concern To Member of Staff Informal
Satisfactory outcome reached?
Yes No further action
No Continue to Stage 2
Stage Two: Head of School’s Investigation
Complainant makes written complaint to Head od School, Investigation conducted and reported to complainant
Satisfactory outcome reached? No
Yes No further action
No Continue to Stage 3
Stage Three: Governors Review
Complainant makes formal complaint to Governing Body Complaints Panel
Panel meeting of Governors Complainant and Head Teacher attend
Satisfactory outcome reached?
Yes No further action
No Continue to Stage 4
Stage Four: Beyond The School
Complainant appeals to Ombudsman/Secretary of State