Reviewed: July 2016
Approved by Director: July 2016
Review: July 2017
Management and staff are likely to have little experience of dealing with fraud and when suspected cases arise, may be unsure of the appropriate action to take. The objectives of this response plan are to:
All actual or suspected incidents of fraud should be reported without delay to the School Business Manager and/or the Accounting Officer/Head of School.
When staff report suspected fraud it is important that their suspicions are treated seriously and that all details provided by the reporting employee are recorded accurately and in a timely manner. They should be repeated back to the reporting employee to confirm understanding. It is essential that staff are put at ease, since the decision to report the suspected fraud may be traumatic for the individual concerned. Those reporting fraud should be assured that all information will be dealt with in the strictest
confidence and that anonymity will be preserved if requested, unless that is incompatible with a full and fair investigation. The anonymity of any whistleblower must be guaranteed at the initial investigation stage.
Once the School Business Manager has recorded the details of the case, he or she should, within 24 hours, hold a meeting with the Senior Leadership Team (SLT) to decide on the initial response.
At this stage management should also take whatever steps are necessary to prevent further losses, for example by changing procedures or suspending payments without compromising the quality of evidence or alerting the fraudsters.
On receiving the details of the suspected fraud, the Senior Leadership Team should undertake as limited review as necessary to establish whether further action needs to be taken. This will normally be an investigation, led by internal audit. The decision by the group to initiate a special investigation shall constitute authority to internal audit to use time provided in the internal audit plan for special investigations, or contingency time, or to switch internal audit resources from planned audits.
If this initial investigation suggests that suspicions are confirmed, the group will decide which body is best placed to undertake further investigative work and will inform the principal, the chair of the governing body, auditors, the funding body and the police as appropriate. The circumstances in which the institution must inform the funding body of actual or suspected fraud are set out in the funding body’s audit code of practice. The principal is responsible for informing the funding body of any such incidents.
Where the initial investigation provides reasonable grounds for suspecting a member or members of staff of fraud, the SLT will need to decide how to prevent further loss. Fraudulent or corrupt activity is regarded as a breach of contract and where there are reasonable grounds for suspicion then suspension, with or without pay, of the suspects is likely, pending the outcome of enquiries.
The rights of staff on suspension must be acknowledged, for example their right to union representation and to be informed of the reason for their suspension.
It may be necessary to plan the timing of suspension to prevent the suspects from destroying or removing evidence that may be needed to support disciplinary or criminal action. Suspect(s) should be supervised at all times before leaving the institution’s premises. They should be allowed to collect
personal property under supervision, but should not be able to remove any property belonging to the institution. Any security passes and keys to premises, offices and furniture should be returned.
Advice should be obtained on the best means of denying access to the institution while suspects remain suspended (for example by changing locks and informing security staff not to admit the individuals to any part of the premises). Similarly, access permissions to the institution’s computer systems should be withdrawn without delay.
Internal audit should consider whether it is necessary to investigate systems other than that which has given rise to suspicion, through which the suspect may have had opportunities to misappropriate the institution’s assets.
At this stage, the institution should decide if external parties including the funding body and the police are to be involved. Delays in contacting the police may prejudice future enquiries and alerting them immediately is important since they will be able to advise the institution on how best to proceed and the most effective methods to gather evidence.
Once it has been agreed that there is sufficient evidence to justify a fuller investigation, the SLT should meet with the police where appropriate to decide who is best placed to undertake further investigation. Should it be decided that an internal investigation is appropriate, either in tandem with a police investigation or on its own, it is important that it is undertaken by individuals with experience of fraud investigations. This is most likely to be internal auditors, supported as necessary by the institution’s staff, who may have specialist knowledge and external specialists where appropriate.
Where fraud and corruption are suspected, contact by the School Business Manager and the head of internal audit with the local fraud squad should be considered in order to agree an appropriate course of action.
For internal investigations, the SLT should agree the following:
There is a clear requirement to record all details fully, accurately and in a manner that is accessible. The police should be able to advise on an appropriate recording format. Developing a simple form to log all events and contacts made will provide a quick summary, ease the recording process and provide documented support for any future enquiries or possible prosecution.
It is important that any losses incurred by the institution are fully and accurately recorded and that costs are correctly apportioned. In addition to the direct cost of losses attributable to fraud, all costs associated with enquiries should be recorded.
These will be required under loss reporting procedures and may also be required by the courts if the decision to prosecute is taken and in determining any assessment of costs or compensation and insurance recoveries.
Where the loss is substantial, legal advice should be obtained without delay about the need to freeze the suspect’s assets through the court, pending conclusion of the investigation. Legal advice should also be obtained about prospects for recovering losses through the civil court, where the perpetrator refuses repayment.
A major objective in any fraud investigation will be the punishment of the perpetrators, to act as a deterrent to other personnel. The institution must follow disciplinary procedures against any member of staff who has committed fraud.
The institution will normally pursue the prosecution of any such individual. Of crucial importance is the need to conduct enquiries within the parameters of relevant laws and regulations. Employees have certain statutory rights, and if infringed, the likelihood of success of disciplinary action is diminished. It is vital, therefore, that any interviews with suspects are undertaken strictly in accordance with established procedures. No interviews should take place without first seeking advice from the police and from the School Business Manager on the relevant procedures and rules to be followed. In particular all those involved in interviewing suspects should have knowledge of the 1994 Police and Criminal Evidence Act.
Internal audit will need to:
If fraud is proven which involves staff, appropriate disciplinary action will be taken. Such action may be considered not only against those found to have perpetrated the fraud, but also against managers whose negligence may have facilitated it.
Any variation from the approved fraud response plan, together with reasons for the variation, should be reported promptly to the chair of the governing body.
At the end of a case, irrespective of the outcome, it is important that the progress of the investigation is reviewed to see what lessons can be learned and to assess the effectiveness of the action taken. Such reviews will help identify any weaknesses in internal control that initially led to the fraud and should highlight any deficiencies in these systems for reporting and investigating, enable more effective future enquiries and precipitate changes to internal procedures designed to prevent reoccurrence.
This report will normally be prepared by internal audit.
The staff handbook includes a requirement that any request for a reference for a member of staff who has been disciplined or prosecuted for fraud should be referred to the School Business Manager. The SBM should prepare any answer to a request for a reference having regard to employment law.
This plan will be reviewed for fitness of purpose at least annually or after each use. Any need for change will be reported to the governing body for approval.